TAP200 Power Consumption: Difference between revisions

From Teltonika Networks Wiki
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Averaged''' TAP200 power consumption values in different states of operation are represented in the table(s) below:<br><br>
'''Averaged''' TAP200 power consumption values in different states of operation are represented in the table(s) below:
 
<table class="nd-othertables_3">
<table class="nd-othertables_3">
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</span></th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</center></th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</center></th>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Idle (44 V)</td>
         <td>Idle (44 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>71</b></td>
       <td><center><b>71</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.12</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.12</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Idle (50 V)</td>
         <td>Idle (50 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>63</b></td>
       <td><center><b>63</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.15</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.15</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
         <td>Idle (54 V)</td>
         <td>Idle (54 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>59</b></td>
       <td><center><b>59</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.19</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.19</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Idle (57 V)</td>
         <td>Idle (57 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>58</b></td>
       <td><center><b>58</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.31</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.31</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
</table>
</table>
Line 32: Line 33:
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</span></th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</center></th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</center></th>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (44 V)</td>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (44 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>87</b></td>
       <td><center><b>87</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.83</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.83</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (50 V)</td>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (50 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>78</b></td>
       <td><center><b>78</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.9</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.9</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (54 V)</td>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (54 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>73</b></td>
       <td><center><b>73</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>3.94</b></td>
       <td><center><b>3.94</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (57 V)</td>
         <td>Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (57 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>71</b></td>
       <td><center><b>71</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>4.05</b></td>
       <td><center><b>4.05</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
</table>
</table>
Line 61: Line 62:
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
     <tr style="font-weight:bold">
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
         <th width=800>Test type</th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</span></th>
       <th width=150><center>Current (mA)</center></th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</th>
       <th width=170><center>Power consumption (W)</center></th>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (44 V)</td>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (44 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>107</b></td>
       <td><center><b>107</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>4.71</b></td>
       <td><center><b>4.71</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (50 V)</td>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (50 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>95</b></td>
       <td><center><b>95</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>4.75</b></td>
       <td><center><b>4.75</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (54 V)</td>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (54 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>90</b></td>
       <td><center><b>90</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>4.86</b></td>
       <td><center><b>4.86</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (57 V)</td>
         <td>1 LAN devices connected <sup><small>1</small></sup> + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load <sup><small>2</small></sup> (57 V)</td>
       <td><center><b>88</b></td>
       <td><center><b>88</b></center></td>
       <td><center><b>5.02</b></td>
       <td><center><b>5.02</b></center></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
</table>
</table>


<small><sup><small>1</small></sup> - Data streams between TAP200 and other connected LAN devices created using iPerf.</small> <br>
<small><sup><small>1</small></sup> - Data streams between TAP200 and other connected LAN devices created using iPerf.</small> <br>

Latest revision as of 16:07, 11 November 2024

Main Page > TAP Access Points > TAP200 > TAP200 Manual > TAP200 Power Consumption

Averaged TAP200 power consumption values in different states of operation are represented in the table(s) below:

Test type
Current (mA)
Power consumption (W)
Idle (44 V)
71
3.12
Idle (50 V)
63
3.15
Idle (54 V)
59
3.19
Idle (57 V)
58
3.31


Test type
Current (mA)
Power consumption (W)
Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (44 V)
87
3.83
Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (50 V)
78
3.9
Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (54 V)
73
3.94
Data transfer via WiFi (one client) (57 V)
71
4.05


Test type
Current (mA)
Power consumption (W)
1 LAN devices connected 1 + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load 2 (44 V)
107
4.71
1 LAN devices connected 1 + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load 2 (50 V)
95
4.75
1 LAN devices connected 1 + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load 2 (54 V)
90
4.86
1 LAN devices connected 1 + data transfer via WiFi (one client) + high CPU load 2 (57 V)
88
5.02

1 - Data streams between TAP200 and other connected LAN devices created using iPerf.
2 - Load created using md5sum (calculation and verification of 128-bit MD5 hashes).
Power consumption may differ due to mobile data transmission speed, testing environment and conditions.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/index.php?title=TAP200_Power_Consumption&oldid=136077"